Using our research, best practices and expertise, we help you understand how to optimize your business processes using applications, information and technology. We provide advisory, education, and assessment services to rapidly identify and prioritize areas for improvement and perform vendor selection
We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.
Services for Technology Vendors
We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.
Despite all the advances organizations have made with respect to analytics, our most recent research shows the majority of the workforce in the majority of organizations are not using analytics and business intelligence (BI). Less than one-quarter (23%) report that one-half or more of their workforce is using analytics and BI. This is a problem. It means organizations are not enabling their workforce to perform at peak efficiency and effectiveness. It means the workforce in many organizations does not have access to the same information by which they are being measured. It means organizations must find other ways to communicate with, and manage, the workforce.
My theory about why this situation exists is that analytics are hard to use. They require skills that many people do not have. Some organizations believe the way to solve this problem is to raise data literacy in the workforce: educate and train people to have a better understanding of data and analytics. Our research shows that training in using analytics may be helpful. Those with better training report better outcomes from their analytics efforts. However, while training may be appropriate as a goal for some personas, I think we can do better for other personas. Rather than train the workforce to do their work in a different, more “data literate” way, why not enhance analytics and adapt them to the way people work?
More than a decade ago, I wrote that BI vendors have been attempting to solve the wrong problem, trying to bring users to BI rather than bringing BI to users. Since that time, satisfaction rates have remained largely unchanged. We reported 37% of participants in our research were satisfied then and in our most recent Analytics and Data Benchmark Research 33% reported they are satisfied now. Sure, expectations are higher now, but technology is also much more powerful. In addition, we have much more data available to analyze and advanced analytics are much more widely available. So, one might expect that satisfaction rates would have risen.
Organizations can increase both the adoption and satisfaction rates for analytics with a two-pronged approach that includes investment in natural language processing and in embedded analytics. It appears that organizations understand the need to embed analytics into operational processes with nearly two-thirds (63%) indicating it is important or very important. However, less than one-third (29%) are using natural language presentation or consider it very important and less than one-quarter (21%) are using natural language search or consider it very important.
Organizations should strive to increase both the satisfaction rates and the adoption rates for analytics. They should consider different measures for different personas. Raising data literacy is valuable for certain personas and will likely increase satisfaction among those individuals. It may not increase adoption much though. To increase adoption, organizations need to take a different approach. They need to consider ways to make analytics more accessible. Embedded analytics and natural language processing are two ways that make analytics more accessible to many of the personas that have been left out in the past.
Regards,
David Menninger
David Menninger leads technology software research and advisory for Ventana Research, now part of ISG. Building on over three decades of enterprise software leadership experience, he guides the team responsible for a wide range of technology-focused data and analytics topics, including AI for IT and AI-infused software.
Ventana Research’s Analyst Perspectives are fact-based analysis and guidance on business,
Each is prepared and reviewed in accordance with Ventana Research’s strict standards for accuracy and objectivity and reviewed to ensure it delivers reliable and actionable insights. It is reviewed and edited by research management and is approved by the Chief Research Officer; no individual or organization outside of Ventana Research reviews any Analyst Perspective before it is published. If you have any issue with an Analyst Perspective, please email them to ChiefResearchOfficer@isg-research.net