Using our research, best practices and expertise, we help you understand how to optimize your business processes using applications, information and technology. We provide advisory, education, and assessment services to rapidly identify and prioritize areas for improvement and perform vendor selection
We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.
Services for Technology Vendors
We provide guidance using our market research and expertise to significantly improve your marketing, sales and product efforts. We offer a portfolio of advisory, research, thought leadership and digital education services to help optimize market strategy, planning and execution.
I have been involved in the contact center industry for more than 25 years and often see organizations that are slow in keeping up with consumers’ expectations; many of them seem reluctant to change, regardless of the need to do so. For example, agents of my cell phone operator ask the same four questions at the start of a call as they did 30 years ago; my bank supports several channels of communication, but it doesn’t provide the same information on all channels; and a well-known airline couldn’t tell me where my bag was for 36 hours (it was at the airport where I departed!). My list goes on, and I am sure you have your own.
On reflection, I trace much of this behavior back to early call centers. They were created essentially to centralize call handling, thereby making the process less expensive. There was a heavy focus on technology and call-handling metrics such as queue times, average handling times and number of call transfers. As companies saw the real cost of handling calls, they introduced cheaper, self-service channels such as IVR and Web-based Q&A, which typically were done so badly that the majority of customers resorted to phoning the call center. In summary, centers were inwardly focused and obsessed with cost savings, and the customer came a poor third. Our research into next-generation customer analytics strongly suggests that little has changed: Companies more often use financial metrics (such as adherence to budget) and process metrics (such as performance vs. SLAs) to assess contact center performance than customer-related metrics (such as customer satisfaction).
However, it is certain that consumers and their preferences have changed, and I don’t mean just millennials. Mobile devices have basically changed the way consumers communicate; even I use text messages and text-based apps more often than calling people. I also find more and more people will do anything to avoid ads; we record TV programs to watch when we want to, and fast-forward through ads; read news online rather than in print; and use filters to send email straight to the spam folder. Millennials in particular have changed the way they shop, preferring to search and buy online rather than visit a retail outlet. To do things when we want to, many of us prefer to use self-service technologies (if they work well) rather than meeting or talking to someone. And we have more choice, so companies have to provide products and customer service that meets our expectations or we will look elsewhere. To respond to this drastic shift, innovative companies are rethinking their business models and using technology to reinvent outdated ways of doing business. Uber is one of the most obvious cases – it uses a mobile app, chat, GPS and a website to change how people hire a “taxi” to get from one place to another – not always successfully in my case, but it has undeniably changed the taxi business.
For the same reasons, contact centers and customer service departments need that degree of change, and they need it now. They have vast amounts of data that is waiting to be analyzed and understood to guide policies and practices. Yet I was astounded at a recent conference when I asked 120 CxOs if they know why customers interact with their company; only five said they do. If you don’t know why your customers are calling, emailing and texting your company, chatting with your employees, searching through your website, screaming at your IVR, posting things about your company on social media, how do you know what you are doing right and wrong, and what is good or bad about your products and services? How do you know what the impact of one business group is on other business units? And very importantly how do you know which of your competitors are outperforming you? You have the data, so use it. Our recent research into next-generation customer engagement shows that while three-fifths (61%) of organizations recognize that analytics will help improve customer engagement, only about one-quarter have applied it to big data. Records of interactions – recorded calls, Web or chat scripts, text messages and social media posts – are big data; they exist in huge volumes and are unstructured. Advanced big data analytics can provide insights from speech, text and event data, and by combining this with transactional business data such as CRM, such a product can produce a comprehensive view of your customers and your interactions with them. It can identify which of your employees are getting it right and which need extra coaching and training. Analytics can identify product and service issues as well as customer preferences, temperament, intentions and trends. It can identify inefficient processes, the journeys customers take across business groups and communication channels and the outcomes of those journeys. In summary, multifaceted analytics can tell you what your company is doing right and wrong, and what you can do about it. This is a key reason why many companies now see analytics as an essential part of any customer experience program, and this will become even more true as the Internet of Things gathers pace and companies acquire even more customer-related data.
Another essential step is to support customers’ choice of communication channels. Our next-generation customer engagement research shows companies moving in the right direction, as on average they now support about seven channels. It also shows that contrary to some opinions that the old channels are not dead or dying; phone calls are still the most popular channel, followed by email and the corporate website. New channels such as virtual agents, video calls and interactive video have begun to be used but only by early adopters. Perhaps even more importantly the research shows companies are expecting growth in all channels, revealing a pent-up demand for customers to engage with those that support their favorite channels. But there is a problem. There is a lot of discussion around omnichannel experience, but the reality is that most companies can’t provide such comprehensive service because their channels of communication have been implemented as silos and are not processed using the same rules or supported with the same information – different information on different channels is not omnichannel. To reach this goal my experience suggests that most vendors providing omnichannel support are based in the cloud – another change that many others need to embrace.
Often in the same discussions about omnichannel, reference is made to the “digital world” because many people prefer to use digital channels of communication rather than speak to other people. As I noted, above the telephone is not dead; some consumers still like to use it, and some are forced to resort to it if self-service or the mobile app fails. Likewise, the contact center is not dead; for example, I recently heard a case study of a company that did not provide a telephone number for its customers to call but had to offer one after an unexpected number of complaints. This means that people are still involved in engaging with customers, and our research shows that every business group except IT is involved with proactive customer engagement. To provide an omnichannel experience companies have to manage all employees who handle interactions to ensure that the right number of skilled employees are in place to handle any form of customer engagement, and to be efficient and effective, they need to use a common set of rules and information to provide this service. To achieve this capability I recommend evaluating suites of advanced workforce optimization systems, which should support collaboration so all employees work from the same basis and groups can work together to resolve customer issues.
Using analytics, omnichannel engagement systems and workforce optimization, all integrated with business systems such as CRM, most organizations can take the first steps toward changing customer engagement to meet customer expectations. But technology alone won’t be enough. Any such program is likely to require cultural change, putting the customer first and process change – changing the customer journey across business groups, communication channels and even during interactions, and focusing on customer- and business-related metrics rather than operational metrics. Several companies ask me which CRM systems can deliver satisfying customer experiences; the answer is that by themselves, none of them can. It requires the combination of systems I have discussed here. Companies that get that right stand a chance of meeting customer expectations and matching what successful competitors do.
Regards,
Richard J. Snow
VP & Research Director, Customer
ISG Software Research is the most authoritative and respected market research and advisory services firm focused on improving business outcomes through optimal use of people, processes, information and technology. Since our beginning, our goal has been to provide insight and expert guidance on mainstream and disruptive technologies. In short, we want to help you become smarter and find the most relevant technology to accelerate your organization's goals.
Ventana Research’s Analyst Perspectives are fact-based analysis and guidance on business,
Each is prepared and reviewed in accordance with Ventana Research’s strict standards for accuracy and objectivity and reviewed to ensure it delivers reliable and actionable insights. It is reviewed and edited by research management and is approved by the Chief Research Officer; no individual or organization outside of Ventana Research reviews any Analyst Perspective before it is published. If you have any issue with an Analyst Perspective, please email them to ChiefResearchOfficer@isg-research.net